Welcome to Simon Fraser University
You have reached this page because we have detected you have a browser that is not supported by our web site and its stylesheets. We are happy to bring you here a text version of the SFU site. It offers you all the site's links and info, but without the graphics.
You may be able to update your browser and take advantage of the full graphical website. This could be done FREE at one of the following links, depending on your computer and operating system.
Or you may simply continue with the text version.

*Windows:*
FireFox (Recommended) http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/
Opera http://www.opera.com/

*Macintosh OSX:*
FireFox (Recommended) http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/
Opera http://www.opera.com/

*Macintosh OS 8.5-9.22:*
The only currently supported browser that we know of is iCAB. This is a free browser to download and try, but there is a cost to purchase it.
http://www.icab.de/index.html
Close x
Searching... Please wait...

Mapping Local Ontologies: Authentic Semantics for Learning Object Evaluation

Candidate: Jerry Li
Type: Master of Science (MSc), School of Interactive Arts and Technology
Date: July 20, 2006
Senior Supervisor:

Dr. John Nesbit

Abstract

Currently, there are no feasible subject taxonomies for learning objects. Large and standardized library classification systems do not present subject descriptors that match varying local practices. When searching for learning objects, teachers, instructional designers and students prefer to use subject terms with which they are already familiar. This research describes the form and function of a mapping ontology that was created to translate between central subject ontology and local subject ontology. An implemented case shows how the mapping ontology can allow teachers working with the British Columbia Ministry of Education science curriculum to search, evaluate, and register learning objects catalogued in a repository (eLera) according to a modified form of Dewey Decimal Classification. Finally, an Information Retrieval evaluation shows “Subject search” has better performance in terms of precision level. A usability survey shows a strong user preference on “Subject search” over “Keyword search”.